Loading
Justice Ginnane said that even though the curfew was a “major restriction of the rights and liberties of the people of Victoria,” it was ultimately a proportionate response and did not violate the human rights of Victorians in the process.
“[Ms] Giles received legal advice that there was a risk that the curfew was not compatible with the [Victorian Charter of Human Rights], although on balance, no such incompatibility existed. I accept her evidence that she did consider the effects of the curfew on human rights applying her four step analysis,” Justice Ginnane found.
“I’m also…
