MPs must declare any gifts they receive on the job — but nothing says they have to declare who provided them.
Federal politicians are not identifying the people and organisations that give them gifts or services because a loophole in guidelines means they are not required to disclose the information — which leaves them open to looking as if they’re obstructing accountability measures.
Nearly 40 years ago the House of Representatives passed a resolution requiring federal MPs to provide a statement of “registrable interests”, and those of their spouses and children. These include shares, real estate, company directorships, gifts, sponsored travel or hospitality — and anything else that could be seen to create a conflict of interest.
The purpose, according to the resolution’s explanatory notes, was to keep the public informed of any such conflicts.
How many goodies do MPs get without disclosing their provenance? Keep reading.
Already a subscriber? Log in to keep reading.
Or, register your email address for a FREE 21-day trial.
